![]() ![]() ![]() I think I saw something that mentioned layer masks but my head is spinning from everything I've read and seen in the last few days so I'd like to stop for a moment first so I don't create further confusion in my head. Thanks for the reply but I think I understand what you mean and perhaps I have already obtained this result, if I have understood correctly with this method you do not get the other effect I want, namely the jagged edges that derive from the perimeter shape of the watercolor texture (and which will replace the original edges of the photo) and the possible effect (always determined by the watercolor shape) of the splashes or stains. There are several ways to create that transparency, the most immediate is the eraser, but you probably want to use a layer mask for more control. * You create transparency in the top image where you want parts the original image. * You apply the effect on the whole image on the second layer (here a simple-minded Oilify * You copy the picture to a second layer (on top) (06-21-2023, 10:40 AM)Ofnuts Wrote: This kind of mixed effect is always done the same way: (at the bottom right follow the arrow for the next layer modes) Quote: - the watercolor effect must not erase the affected parts of the photo but must only modify the image in this way.ĭiminish the opacity of that layer until you're happy (look on top of the layer dialog for the Opacity slider) Quote: - the original edges of the photo must be transformed into the jagged edges of the watercolor effect Splash effect: open the brush dialog and chose the one you like, then "paint on a new layer" ![]() Quote: must be jagged and perhaps with a splash effect, so there could be separate dots and spots Select the layers you want to apply the watercolor effect, then go to Filters > Artistic > Waterpixel.` possibly this watercolor effect must already exist, in the sense that a texture should be used (or maybe some other kind of solution that I don't know about), and the edges of this texture Quote: - apply an effect (in this case watercolour) towards the margins of the photo, for an amplitude to be evaluated I'll just give you some youtube tutorial (quickly found), and after watching them you should be able to do what you need.Īnyway after what said Ofnuts (which is a good start) With GIMP you can do it in less than 5 minutes, but let's face it, I don't want to spend an hour or two writing a tutorial with tens of screenshots pointing what to do. Which means you do not have any concepts like layers, mask and so on (see at the bottom), Quote: I started using Gimp a few days ago and I don't even know other similar software. I apologize for the very basic explanations but I started using Gimp a few days ago and I don't even know other similar software. the watercolor effect must not erase the affected parts of the photo but must only modify the image in this way. the original edges of the photo must be transformed into the jagged edges of the watercolor effect possibly this watercolor effect must already exist, in the sense that a texture should be used (or maybe some other kind of solution that I don't know about), and the edges of this texture must be jagged and perhaps with a splash effect, so there could be separate dots and spots apply an effect (in this case watercolour) towards the margins of the photo, for an amplitude to be evaluated keep the people in the central space without any kind of effect, as they result from the original photo I would like to edit a photo to get this effect: So maybe by schematizing I can be better understood. Hi, need some help, I hope I'm clear enough as I don't speak english.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |